C-61.01 - Natural Heritage Conservation Act

Full text
26. The Minister shall, in cooperation with the minister responsible for the administration of the Act respecting the Société du Plan Nord (chapter S-16.011), propose mechanisms to the Government for achieving, in relation to the area referred to in section 25, the objectives set out in paragraph 5 of section 5 of that Act.
2002, c. 74, s. 26; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP); 2021, c. 1, s. 34.
26. Every application to a judge under this division must be made according to the rules that apply to contentious proceedings set out in the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C‐25.01).
Applications made by the Minister must be notified to the person or persons they concern, but the judge may waive that requirement if the judge considers that the delay resulting from the notification would unnecessarily imperil the natural setting.
All orders issued must be personally notified to the person concerned and may in particular be executed by a peace officer.
Applications are decided by preference and orders issued are executory notwithstanding an appeal. A judge of the Court of Appeal may, however, suspend the execution of an order if the judge considers the suspension is necessary in the interest of justice.
2002, c. 74, s. 26; I.N. 2016-01-01 (NCCP).
26. Every application to a judge under this division must be made according to the rules applicable to ordinary procedure contained in the Code of Civil Procedure (chapter C‐25).
Applications made by the Minister must be served on the person or persons they concern, but the judge may waive that requirement if the judge considers that the delay resulting from the service would unnecessarily imperil the natural setting.
All orders issued must be personally served on the person concerned and may in particular be executed by a peace officer.
Applications are decided by preference and orders issued are executory notwithstanding an appeal. A judge of the Court of Appeal may, however, suspend the execution of an order if the judge considers the suspension is necessary in the interest of justice.
2002, c. 74, s. 26.