P-13.1 - Police Act

Full text
255.1. A police officer, even if no longer in active service, who was imposed a penalty for a transgression of the Code of ethics may apply for a remission, subject to the following restrictions.
No application may be made for a transgression that led to a discharge or dismissal.
An application is inadmissible if
(1)  the applicable waiting period, according to the rules set out in section 255.2, has not been observed;
(2)  it is incomplete;
(3)  the police officer was found guilty of an offence referred to in subparagraph 3 of the first paragraph of section 115, is under criminal prosecution or, in the year before the application, was the subject of an allegation concerning a criminal offence;
(4)  at the time of the application, an ethics proceeding involving the police officer, including a complaint, is before the Commissioner, the Tribunal, the Court of Québec or any other higher court;
(5)  at the time of the application, the police officer is under another ethics penalty.
2006, c. 33, s. 11; 2023, c. 20, s. 114.
255.1. A police officer, even if no longer in active service, who was imposed a penalty for a transgression of the Code of ethics may apply for a remission, subject to the following restrictions.
No application may be made for a transgression that led to a discharge or dismissal.
An application is inadmissible if
(1)  the applicable waiting period, according to the rules set out in section 255.2, has not been observed;
(2)  it is incomplete;
(3)  the police officer was found guilty of an offence referred to in subparagraph 3 of the first paragraph of section 115, is under criminal prosecution or, in the year before the application, was the subject of an allegation concerning a criminal offence;
(4)  at the time of the application, an ethics proceeding involving the police officer, including a complaint, is before the Commissioner, the ethics committee, the Court of Québec or any other higher court;
(5)  at the time of the application, the police officer is under another ethics penalty.
2006, c. 33, s. 11.